May 28, 2011

Study finds local temperature influences belief in global warming

A study by Columbia Business School Professor Eric Johnson, co-director of the Center for Decision Sciences ( at Columbia Business School, Ye Li, a postdoctoral researcher at the Center for Decision Sciences, and Lisa Zaval, a Columbia graduate student in psychology, found that those who thought the current day was warmer than usual were more likely to believe in and feel concern about global warming than those who thought the day was unusually cold. The study, recently featured in Psychological Science, explains why public belief in global warming can fluctuate, since people can base their thinking off of the day's temperature. The researchers behind this study are also affiliated with Columbia University's Center for Research on Environmental Decisions, CRED (

The team surveyed about 1,200 people in the United States and Australia in three different studies in order to determine their opinions about global warming and whether the temperature on the day of the study was warmer or cooler than usual. Respondents who thought that day was warmer than usual were more concerned about global warming than respondents who thought that day was colder than usual.
"Global warming is so complex, it appears some people are ready to be persuaded by whether their own day is warmer or cooler than usual, rather than think about whether the entire world is becoming warmer or cooler," said lead author Ye Li. "It is striking that society has spent so much money, time and effort educating people about this issue, yet people are still so easily influenced."
The study also revealed that respondents were fairly good at knowing if it was unusually hot or cold--perceptions correlated with reality three quarters of the time. While politics, gender and age all had the predicted influences – for instance, on the researchers' 1-to-4 scale of belief in global warming, Democrats were 1.5 points higher than Republicans – after controlling for the other factors, the researchers found that perceived temperatures still had nearly two-thirds the power as political belief, and six times the power as gender.
These results join a growing body of work that shows how irrelevant environmental information, such as the current weather, can affect judgments and opinions on climate change.

Subscribe to RSS Feed or Get update via Email


  1. Why is everybody blaming this on the co2 we release in the atmosphere, what happened when volcanoes did that, the sequential raise in temperature of the climate of the years. this is just a natural circle. preventing this will result in far worse.

    call Bangladesh

  2. I thought those where just natural cycles that have taken place on earth since the beginning of time.

  3. I think we all need to step up and start protecting the world environment so that we can ensure better health for you and me.

  4. Wow, you guys actually wasted the money to study that? I thought that only America was that stupid!

    Would local temperatures affect belief in Global Warming... hmmm... let me see? I think that there's already a phrase for that: " Seeing Is Believing ". Likewise, however, the failure to see it should also produce the opposite effect!